Social Democracy at the ballot box DSA members win elections nationwide
2017Wayne Deluca 2017-12Read it in the scan (PDF at ETOL), page 11 →
The words are the paper's own, from its digital file; the division into articles was made by machine, so a box or caption can end up inside the article next to it.
Scan page 11
On Nov. 7, at least 17 members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) won elections around the United States. Most notable was Lee Carter, who was elected to the Virginia House of Del egates, unseating Republican Majority Whip Jackson Miller. The rest mostly ran for town or city councils. All of the candidates ran either as Democrats or in non-partisan council races, and were part of a strong Democratic showing in the off-year election.
Carter’s campaign was run on ex panding Medicaid, a $15 minimum wage, and limiting corporate influence in politics. Because he was vocal about running as a socialist, Carter was aban doned by the official Democratic Party and received no funding outside of his own fundraising. His program, moder ate as it was, is far more radical than the majority of the city council candidates, who mostly ran on good-government principles.
In the wake of Bernie Sanders’s pri mary campaign, the word “socialist” has become attractive to many young people. What matters is not the word, but the content behind it. Carter’s full program could have been adopted by many liberals. For most of the city coun cil winners, one would not have known they were socialists unless they said so.
The DSA has had many elected of ficials before, and has been linked to ... Trump: ‘Haitians get out!’ members of Congress at different times. The latest crop is only noteworthy be cause DSA grew from 5000 to 30,000 dues-paying members following the Sanders campaign and the election of Donald Trump.
For revolutionary socialists, bour geois elections are not the way we seek to change society. There is no parlia mentary road to socialism. The state is a tool of the capitalist class to control workers and the oppressed, and taking hold of it without revolutionary mea sures will not change who runs society.
This lesson was demonstrated harsh ly in 2015, when Syriza took power in Greece and found itself the administra tor of the same austerity it had run to oppose. Only a revolutionary overturn of the capitalist class will create a so ciety run for human needs rather than private profits.
But we do see a positive role for so cialist participation in elections. They provide an opening for socialists to spread their ideas and win over sup porters who otherwise would not be tuned in to political events. When they win, socialists should use their office not to administer capitalism but as a bully pulpit to advocate for and orga nize the struggles of workers and the oppressed. We also see the need to offer a socialist choice against the two capi talist parties.
By running as Democrats, the DSA can didates blur this line. The official stance of DSA is that its members should run as “open socialists,” but they treat the Democrats as one option among many to do so. This is a mistake.
The value of running as a socialist lies precisely in the challenge to the hegemony of the two capitalist parties. James P. Cannon, the founder of Ameri can Trotskyism, said in a 1958 speech: “The unconditional break away from capitalist politics and capitalist parties is the first act of socialist conscious ness, and the first test of socialist seri ousness and sincerity.”
Cannon’s point remains true today. The Democrats are a corrosive force that offers pragmatism and easy victo ries, but at the cost of making politics acceptable in capitalist democracy. The DSA’s electoral successes are not a true barometer of the appeal of socialist ideas, but a reflection of a larger Demo cratic wave. Without a conscious break (Above) Virginia DSAer Gary Carter.
from the Democrats there is no com mitment to moving beyond the capital ist system.
In the era of Trump, there is an un precedented opportunity to build a mass socialist movement that will chal lenge capital in the belly of the beast. There is an appetite for struggle against inequality, injustice, and oppression in all their forms. But such a movement faces a tide seeking to turn anti-Trump momentum into a mere get-out-thevote effort for the capitalist, imperial ist Democrats. Only by moving against this current can the left gain the needed clarity of vision and purpose to build a revolutionary party and win.
Taking the muddled road of the DSA leads right back into the Democratic Party trap that the left so badly needs to escape. n