Socialist Action (US)

The monthly paper of Socialist Action, San Francisco, 1983–2018

Labor Briefing

Socialist Action, Vol. 35, No. 11, November 2017 · scan pp. 3–4 · Bill Onasch · about 1,296 words

Read it in the scan (PDF at ETOL), page 3 →

The words are the paper's own, from its digital file; the division into articles was made by machine, so a box or caption can end up inside the article next to it.

Scan page 3

No VIPs in St Louis—The AFL-CIO quadrennial convention to elect officers and pass policy resolutions was held in St. Louis, Oct. 22-25. While many of the big­ gest unions—the National Education As­ sociation, Service Employees International Union, Teamsters, and Carpenters—are not affiliated, the federation still represents 12.5 million workers.

In response to police killings of African Americans, racial profiling, and voter sup­ pression, St. Louis became the launching pad for the Black Lives Matter movement. A pre-convention conference on Diversity and Inclusion attracted hundreds of arriv­ ing delegates along with many in the local communities.

When speakers from Black Lives Matter didn’t show, it was discovered that entry of a BLM contingent had been blocked by Convention Center management. Hundreds of delegates then took the conference out­ side to join them in solidarity. After only a few minutes, management relented and all marched in to the scheduled venue. The three top officers—Richard Trumka, president; Liz Shuler, secretary-treasurer; Tefre Gebre, executive vice president— were reelected without opposition. In their acceptance speeches all three spoke to the convention theme—Join Together; Fight Together; Win Together. But underlying this surface of unity were currents of major differences that often were responsible for glaring omissions and compromises in the 56 adopted resolutions.

There was a resolution “War Is Not the Answer,” but unions in the war industries insisted on another, “Support 100 Percent Buy American In Defense.” The Labor Campaign for Single-Payer did a good job in putting the federation on record support­ ing the “Medicare For All” campaign. But the same resolution said they would for now also keep on championing the Afford­ able Care Act, aka ObamaCare, written by and for the insurance Robber Barons.

Perhaps the most contentious issue of all is climate change. The building trades, rail, and mine worker unions, eager to get fossil-fuel-related jobs, take a position similar to Trump’s. Other affiliates like National Nurses United and the Amalgamated Tran­ sit Union are part of the Labor Network for Sustainability, which advocates a Just Transition approach to protecting work­ ers whose jobs will be lost in the switch to clean, renewable energy. The two sides faced off and nearly came to blows during the Tribes’ occupation at Standing Rock, which attempted to block construction of the Dakota Access pipeline.

Resolution 55, “Climate Change, Ener­ gy and Union Jobs,” was in most respects a big advance. It unequivocally endorsed the consensus of climate scientists about the devastating impact of global warming resulting from carbon emissions and urged the U.S. government to implement commit­ ments in the Paris Climate Accords. And it advocates Just Transition for displaced workers and their communities affected by energy restructuring.

But while promoting clean, renewable energy alternatives that are crucial to end­ ing carbon emissions, it also throws a dan­ gerous sop to coal miners and the building trades by including gimmicks like the coal industry pipe dream of “carbon capture and storage”—and nuclear power.

There is never going to be “clean coal.” Nuclear reactors don’t emit greenhouse gases but they do leave behind radioactive waste that remains dangerous to humans for centuries. There is no known protocol for securing this threat over such a time span. And, of course, there is the danger of catastrophic accidents like Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Three Mile Island. Nukes have no place in our energy future. There were other good resolutions on im­ migration, public education, fighting fas­ cism, $15 minimum wage, and the humani­ tarian crisis in Puerto Rico. But all 56 share a common attribute—their objectives can­ not be achieved through collective bargain­ ing. They are all essentially political ques­ tions. And unions in the United States are the only labor movement in the English-speaking world not to have a labor party of their own.

Past AFL-CIO conventions typically featured speeches by big-name Democrat “friends of labor.” Usually, that was about all that interested the corporate media. But such Establishment VIPs were not invited this year. This was a belated recognition of what polls have shown over the past several years—the working-class majority is fed up with both major parties and think there should be a new alternative.

Resolution 2, “An Independent Political Voice,” begins: “For decades, the political system has failed working people. Acting on behalf of corporations and the rich and powerful, the political system has been tak­ ing away, one after another, the pillars that support working people’s right to good jobs and secure benefits.”

That’s true enough—though socialists would begin the time line around the In­ dustrial Revolution. Resolution 2 contin­ ues: “Against this, we have one choice. We must give working people greater political power by speaking with an unquestionably independent political voice, backed by a unified labor movement.” But “voice” is secretary-treasurer; Richard Trumka, president; Tefre Gebre, exec. vice president—all reelected.

not a party, and power cannot be shared between hostile classes.

There appeared to be three distinct camps with incompatible visions among the delegates:

• The bureaucracy that still follows the advice of Samuel Gompers, the first president of the American Federation of Labor, to reward your friends and punish your enemies among the candi­ dates of the two boss parties. • Leaders of several major activist unions that support the effort of the “socialist” Bernie Sanders to transform the Democrats into “labor’s voice.” • A smaller but significant group that wants to revive the once promising, now defunct Labor Party.

The first two strategies have a long, well-documented track record of failure. It’s high time that American workers, like our British class siblings, choose option 3. UE Beats Koch Brothers—The Trumpite Iowa state legislature hoped to wipe out public-sector unions by requiring them to be recertified every year in which they ne­ gotiate a contract. That means winning an election with a majority of the bargaining unit, not just of those voting. The indepen­ dent United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers has six contracts coming up. The UE won all six, with 87 percent opting to stay union.

Glad Grads—Finally overcoming objec­ tions and delays by the University of Chi­ cago administration, U of C graduate stu­ dent workers got their chance to vote in an NLRB representation election in late Octo­ ber. It wasn’t close—1,103 to 479 in favor of Grad Students United, affiliated with the Illinois Federation of Teachers. This neces­ sary first step now leads to the challenge of negotiating a first contract. n If you have a story for the Labor Briefing please contact [email protected]

Scan page 4

Santi Palacios / AP within the growth of these years and those of the capitalist system itself. Therefore, let’s not allow them to deceive us. In the whole of the Spanish state we have more in common with the Catalan worker than with the Spanish capitalist. Defend­ ing a democratic right as basic as the right to de­ cide remains a component of elementary solidarity among peoples.

Let’s not allow them to deceive us. If Rajoy, the IBEX 35, the King, and the EU, which have battered the working class and the youth so hard in these years, are so nervous, it is not because the possible independence of Catalonia would be detrimental to the interests of working people, but simply be­ cause it calls into question the rule of the regime of ’78, the monarchy, and the immediate interests of the Spanish capitalists—and above all, because the struggle for the right to decide can unchain other social struggles in Catalonia that put deeper changes on the table.

Against their repression, our solidarity With the presentation of Article 155, any doubt has been removed about the reactionary attack that was to take place as soon as the [Catalan] gov­ ernment backed down.

The dismissal of [Catalan President] Puigdemont, [Catalan Vice President] Junqueras, and the coun­

← Contents of Vol. 35, No. 11, November 2017

Something wrong on this page? Tell us →