Malcolm X: His relevance to today’s struggle
2015Era Burke 2015-05Read it in the scan (PDF at ETOL), page 3 →
The words are the paper's own, from its digital file; the division into articles was made by machine, so a box or caption can end up inside the article next to it.
Scan page 3
The following remarks by Socialist Action member Era Burke were presented at an April 24 Bay Area Socialist Action public forum at the Niebyl Proctor Library in Oak land, Calif., entitled, “Revolutionaries past and present: Their relevance today from Malcolm X, on the 50th an niversary of his murder, to Mumia Abu-Jamal, on his 61st (April 24) birthday, and for his life and freedom now!”
Burke was joined by Socialist Action members and sup porters Daniel Delaine Ally, Vanessa Andrews, and Jeff Mackler.
Let’s start off with a number: 368. That is the number of people the police have killed this year.
Another figure: 36. That is the number of policecaused deaths this month alone, nationwide. Let’s go even smaller: 8. The number of hours on average that pass between police killings.
Every eight hours—36 deaths in 24 days. By late April, more deaths than there are days in a year. Think about that.
If the eight-hour trend remains—that is, if the number of hours between police killings does not decrease—we are on track to have 2950 deaths by the end of 2015. That is nearly 3000 people!
So what are we doing about it? Let’s look from the top down. Our president has been silent on the issue. Con gress has been silent on the issue. What about the poli ticians who will spend millions, if not billions, to try and convince you to put a little checkmark by their name at the polls next year? Also silent.
Why? Because helping the poor and marginalized is not in their best interests.
The police have become militarized over the last sev eral decades. Weapons and equipment no longer used on the battlefields of U.S. imperialism are being sold to our city police forces at wholesale, thanks to the mili tary industrial complex.
The military industrial complex can’t sell weapons to police officers if they aren’t able to use them on some one.
So what are we doing about it?
Fifty-one years ago Malcolm X was asked for his thoughts on capitalism, the need for radical political behavior, and what he called “a showdown between economic systems.” He replied: “I believe there will ulti mately be a cash between the oppressed and those who do the oppressing.”
What we see are the echoes of that conflict. Ferguson and Black Lives Matter have become symbols not only of death at police hands, but examples of what may hap pen if you find yourself on the wrong side of the power of our police state.
So what are we doing about it?
We cannot depend on the representatives of the pow er structure that got us here to risk their necks for the marginalized. You only need to look at any court case in volving these deaths to see that conviction, at any level, is the exception.
Killing Black people, poor people, marginalized peo ple? That is the rule.
“You get your freedom by letting your enemy know that you’ll do anything to get your freedom.” Malcolm said that as well.
What does that mean? According to Malcolm, it meant radical thinking and action. “They’ll call you an extrem ist, or subversive, or seditious, or a radical. But when you stay radical long enough, and get enough people to be like you, you’ll get your freedom.”
So what are we doing about it?
We have to be there, to be heard. We have to stand, march, chant. We have to compel the system to change by being the ones who change it ourselves. Because business as usual is killing us. n SOCIALIST ACTION MAY 2015 3
Scan page 4
Mike Healey / IRIN (Left) Destruction near Dammaj, northern Yemen.
Mohammed Mori government in the 2013 U.S.-backed military coup.
The Obama administration recently sent its own ar mada to enforce the blockade of Yemen, lest the Ira nians seek to deliver food and other non-military aid to the now-starving Yemeni people. Iranian ships car rying food and medical supplies have been prevented from doing so.
White House communications director Jen Psaki, ap ing the Saudi monarch’s line that their objective is to defend their own “national security” interests, stated on April 22, “They [the Saudis] are worried about their own security. And of course, we’ve supported them with their actions.” In fact, the U.S. has provided virtually all the intelligence and logistical support for the Saudi bombing.
Both the U.S. and Saudi Arabian military chiefs ini tially believed that bombing the Houthi rebels to smithereens, reducing the nation to near-starvation and threatening a massive ground invasion would bring the Houthi rebels, long alienated from the po litical process and victims of the massive corruption