Socialist Action (US)

The monthly paper of Socialist Action, San Francisco, 1983–2018

Don’t Miss an Issue!

Socialist Action, Vol. 32, No. 10, October 2014 · scan pp. 2–4 · about 2,034 words

Read it in the scan (PDF at ETOL), page 2 →

The words are the paper's own, from its digital file; the division into articles was made by machine, so a box or caption can end up inside the article next to it.

Scan page 2

Regular rates: — $10 / six months — $20 /12 months ­— $37 /two years — I want to join the Socialist Action Newspaper Supporters Club.

Clip and mail to: Socialist Action newspaper, P.O. Box 10328, Oakland, CA 94610.

Name City State Phone E-mail I enclose an extra contribution of: — $100 — $200 — Other 2 SOCIALIST ACTION OCTOBER 2014 Address Zip • Chicago: P.O. Box 578428 Chicago, IL 60657, [email protected] • Connecticut: (860) 478-5300 • Duluth, Minn.: [email protected]. www.thenorthernworker.blogspot. com • Kansas City: [email protected] (816) 221-3638 • LOUISVILLE, KY: redlotus51@yahoo. com, (502) 451-2193 • Madison, Wis.:

[email protected] • Minneapolis/St. Paul: (612) 8021482, [email protected] • New York City: (212) 781-5157 • Philadelphia: [email protected] • Providence: [email protected] (401) 592-5385 • Salem, Ore.: [email protected] • San Francisco Bay Area:

P.O. Box 10328, Oakland, Ca 94610 (510) 268-9429, sfsocialistaction@ gmail.com • WASHINGTON, DC: [email protected], (202) 286-5493 National Office

Scan page 3

Fast food strikers say — $15 Now and a Union! The web newsletter, “Anticapitalisme et Revolution,” which represents a current in the French New Anticapitalist Party (NPA), recently interviewed Socialist Ac­ tion member Ann Montague in regard to the growing movement in the United States for a minimum wage of $15.. The interview appears below.

The French-language version can be found at: http://anticapitalisme-et-revolu­ tion.blogspot.fr/2014/09/nous-sommes-unmouvement-maintenant.html Anticapitalisme et Revolution: How did your union come to organize fast-food workers?

Ann Montague: I am a member of So­ cialist Action, and I have been a rank-and-file member of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for 30 years. This is the union that provided staff and financial support to the fast food workers who have been organizing demonstrations, actions, and strikes, demanding a living wage of $15 an hour.

SEIU has around 2.2 million members. Most of them are in the United States, with some workers in Canada and Puerto Rico. There are over a million workers in health care, including nurses, laboratory technicians, nursing-home workers, and home-care workers. There are another mil­ lion workers who work in public services in state and local governments and school employees like bus drivers and child care providers. They also include 225,000 workers in property services who work as security and janitors in commercial and res­ idential office buildings. Fifty-six percent of our workers are women, and 40 percent Black and Latino/a. SEIU represents more immigrant workers than any other union in the United States.

When SEIU announced to the membership that they had decided to assist in organizing Fast Food Strikes in New York City in 2012, I was as surprised as anyone. In the 1980s, there were sporadic strikes by state govern­ ment workers, and in the 1990s, SEIU organized janitors working for small cleaning companies in the Justice For Janitors Campaign. The tactics of the janitors were un­ orthodox and included mass civil disobedience with the closing of freeways in Los Angeles and blocking bridges into Washington, D.C.

But from 1998-2010, under the presidency of Andy Stern, we went through a horrible period of vicious fights with other unions. In addition, the top union lead­ ers were purging on fake charges some elected leaders that they saw as disloyal. Some of those who were put in charge were later convicted of corruption. There also were contracts negotiated behind closed doors and deals made with the bosses.

By 2010 the union bureaucracy was divided. Some complained about Stern’s authoritarian leadership style, and in the middle of his term he was forced to resign. Saying they were looking for a consensus builder, they voted for Mary Kay Henry. She promised to rebuild rela­ tionships with other unions and clean up the corruption. The bureaucracy chose her to lead SEIU. In 2012, Henry brought forward to her Executive Board the controversial proposal to put staff and resources into organizing fast-food workers. Not to bring them in as members but to raise wages of the entire sector. One wing of the bureaucracy was against it, and while Henry prevailed, it was believed that if the campaign were not successful, and all that money were spent on workers who are not even members of SEIU, she would not be reelected. Her argument was that if they could raise wages in an entire labor sector that it would impact all wages. AR: How did this movement start?

AM: In 2012, a group called New York Communities For Change was working on affordable housing in New York City. They soon realized that the fast-food work­ ers they talked to could not even afford low-cost apart­ ments. They were sleeping in homeless shelters and on the floors of friends’ apartments. As a result, SEIU start­ ed organizing meetings over the low pay for fast-food workers. The workers soon decided that they wanted $15 an hour and a union and that they were willing to strike. The first strike was in New York in November 2012, when 200 workers walked off the job, and their numbers have continued to grow. In May of this year, there were strikes in 150 cities and 33 countries. On Sept. 4 was the seventh strike, and it was larger, including more cities in the South and Southwest. There was civil disobedience, and in eight cities home-care workers marched with fastfood workers demanding $15 an hour.

AR: What are the main demands?

AM: For now, there are only two demands. They are: $15 an hour and the right to a union without intimida­ tion. In the United States there is a Federal Minimum Wage that applies to all 50 states. Some states have one that is higher. Currently, the Federal Minimum Wage is $7.25. In his speech at the March On Washington in 1963, Martin Luther King called for a $2 minimum wage. Adjusted for inflation today, that $2 would now be $15.27. In general $15 is considered to be a “living wage” while anything below that is a “poverty wage”. AR: What is the government’s response?

AM: The main government response has been silence. We are entering elections in November. Politicians know that the people support raising the minimum wage, so they cannot openly oppose an increase.

President Obama finally came out with a proposal to raise the Federal Minimum Wage to $10.10. This was to undercut the strikes and demonstrations. However, they were unable to stop the momentum of this movement. The labor organizations that are the most obedient ser­ vants of the Democratic Party are trying to get work­ ers to support a state minimum wage of $11, but they are not having much success. The argument they cannot overcome is that anything less than $15 is a “poverty wage.” While the Democrats are experts at derailing so­ cial movements so far, they have not stopped the “Fight For $15 and a Union” struggle.

AR: How about retaliation?

AM: There has not been a lot of retaliation. Federal law permits “concerted activity” by workers. This means that workers are allowed to join together to complain to employers about working conditions.

The Fast Food Strikes are not traditional strikes where workers leave their job and picket their workplace to try to prevent other workers or customers from entering the place of business. These workers leave work for one day and are joined by community members and others who support them in demonstrations and rallies throughout the cities. Generally it is not all the workers in one res­ taurant but workers from many different fast food restau­ rants joining together.

Also there is what is called a “walk back.” The fol­ lowing day, when they go back to work, they are never alone. The staff of a union or other supporters go back into the restaurant with them. Generally, the response by other workers is applause, thanks, and congratulations. I have heard that in a few places these workers have their work hours cut or are “written up” for some small Tony Savino / Socialist Action infraction. But often a higher up manager has inter­ vened. It seems the bosses understand that reprisals run the chance of sparking more protests, and possibly next time more workers will join the strike activity. As these actions spread from big cities to smaller cities there may be some problems. This month Tucson, Ariz., had its first fast-food strike, and there are reports that there was some retaliation when the strikers returned to work. Arizona is a very anti-union state, and Tucson is a small city. However, supporters of the strikers are plan­ ning ways to pressure bosses to end harassment of these workers, and SEIU will take legal action based on the right to “concerted activity.”

AR: In some cities we saw union members join the Ferguson protests. What are the links between the two movements?

AM: Historically, there was a strong link between the Black civil rights movement and unions. Martin Luther King worked closely with many unions whose members were predominately Black. In fact, he was in Memphis to show his solidarity with striking sanitation workers who were members of AFCSME, a large public sector union, when he was assassinated. A. Philip Randolph was a leader in both the civil rights and the labor movements. He organized and led the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, the first predominantly Black labor union. While there is a strong history of racism in many unions, some public sector unions have a legacy of hu­ man rights and social justice. The American union tradi­ tion of solidarity, and the motto of “an injury to one is an injury to all,” is still strong in some unions. But more important is the fact that the victims of po­ lice brutality and their families are also union members. Members of SEIU 1199 in New York City were active in demonstrations against the police policy of “Stop And Frisk.” In the Black community, most young men have been harassed, stopped, and searched by the police with­ out cause.

Ferguson is in Missouri, which is a relatively strong union state. There were big fast-food strikes in Kansas City and St. Louis—cities with large Black communi­ ties. In Kansas City, workers walked out of 60 restau­ rants. Most of the strikers were Black or Latina. In Ferguson, contingents of a group called “Show Me $15” were active in the demonstrations. Shermale Humphries was one member who said that she used to work at the McDonald’s across the street from where Mike Brown was killed. “This [protesting] is something I had to do,” she said. “I’m African American, and this could be anyone I know. I just can’t let it go on any longer.” She credited her experience organizing fastfood strikes as helping her organize in Ferguson. Also, Michael Brown’s mother was a member of the United Food And Commercial Workers (UFCW). The head of (continued on page 8, in “‘We can win this issue!’”)

SOCIALIST ACTION OCTOBER 2014 3

Scan page 4

Tony Savino / Socialist Action face that the U.S. is meeting its obligation to cut carbon emissions. He didn’t have to address the demands of the mass movement—because none were put forward in a unified voice.

The obligation that Obama hypocritically re­ ferred to—the pledge to cut carbon dioxide emissions “in the range of 17 percent below 2005 levels by the year 2020”—was of the president’s own making at the 2010 COP (Con­ ference of Parties) Summit in Copenhagen.

Immediately after that gathering, which was supposed to work out an international treaty to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the U.S. was roundly condemned by climate change ac­ tivists for being the wrecking ball that caused the talks to collapse. In the middle of that con­ ference, a conspiracy of U.S. and European negotiators to strong arm conference attend­ ees into a one-sided agreement was revealed, throwing the negotiations into turmoil. In the wake of the uproar and mass arrests of activ­ ists outside the conference, Obama jetted in and announced the back-door non-binding agreement between the U.S., Brazil, China, In­ dia, and South Africa that he now ballyhoos as being nearly met.

The 17%-by-2020 “accord” was denounced by the rest of the world as an undemocratic sham and ecocidal. A team of scientists from

----- pull-quotes -----

Socialist Action Canada

526 Roxton Road, Toronto, Ont. M6G 3R4, (416) 535-8779 http://socialistaction.ca/

← Contents of Vol. 32, No. 10, October 2014

Something wrong on this page? Tell us →