Socialist Action (US)

The monthly paper of Socialist Action, San Francisco, 1983–2018

U.S. hands off Venezuela!

Socialist Action, Vol. 32, No. 3, March 2014 · scan p. 3 · Christine Marie · about 852 words

Read it in the scan (PDF at ETOL), page 3 →

The words are the paper's own, from its digital file; the division into articles was made by machine, so a box or caption can end up inside the article next to it.

Scan page 3

As rebellions spread across the globe in response to the harsh realities of neo-liberal austerity, it is im­ portant to examine each uprising closely. We need to understand the reasons people mobilize in the streets. We can’t lend support to every protest move­ ment because they are not all progressive, demo­ cratic, or fighting for workers’ rights. All too often the issues are quite complex, and news stories in the mainstream media will simplify or distort them in order to advance the agenda of the economic rulers.

Today, Venezuela is ensnared in a social upheaval spurred on in the wake of an economy devastated by massive inflation, food shortages, and corruption on many levels. Eager spectators are having difficulty un­ derstanding the forces in play. The situation is made even more confusing by social media saturated with messages such as #PrayForVenezuela, #LaSalida, or “8 Things You Should Know about the Venezuelan Protests” that call for the ouster of the president. Yet others point out that the class base of the protesters embodies wealthier Venezuelans and the interests of big business.

Which side is right? Who should honest working people support? On one hand, those claiming lead­ ership of the protest movement are clearly looking to restore the full power of Venezuela’s capitalist class. This movement is most vigorously represented by Leopoldo López, trained and educated in the U.S. and a leading figure of the violent 2002 coup attempt against then President Hugo Chavez.

On the other hand, there exists a militant working-class and trade-union movement that has taken over factories, thwarted a coup, and organized resistance from the poor barrios through decades of struggle against the brutal capitalist classes of Venezuela and the United States.

In between the workers and the capitalists sits Pres­ ident Nicolas Maduro of Chavez’s Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (PSUV). The PSUV is only socialist in name and presides over a capitalist economy. Lead­ ers in the party have walked a thin line vacillating be­ tween the interests of the workers and the demands of the capitalists. Such a contradictory set-up cannot function in favor of Venezuela’s working poor for long, and indeed, the reforms are falling apart. For example, the national health system is crumbling. This affects a large section of the country’s 600,000 primary school teachers, who have no health coverage (see Marea So­ cialista, “The Bolivarian Process without Chavez”).

The capitalist class, however unhinged by the strug­ gles of the masses, still control the majority of the country and have been anxious to intervene. Disdain­ ing all of the reforms made under Chavez, reaction­ (Left) Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro Varies are exploiting the current economic situ­ ation to undermine his successor and begin a campaign to regain control. The unwillingness of Chavez before his death, and now President Maduro, to lead the working class in complete­ ly smashing all institutions of capital has left a wide gap for the potential defeat of any gains won by workers in Venezuela.

There are countless examples of how work­ er’s movements are defeated when revolutions are only made halfway. “Lessons of Working Class Defeats,” a pamphlet published by Social­ ist Action, goes into greater depth regarding historic defeats in Spain, Chile, and Peru. Work­ ers and students should study closely these les­ sons from the past as they watch events around the world unfold. While life may look different today, the same social forces that gave rise to those defeats are still very much in existence. Venezuelan workers are perfectly capable of organizing and waging their own struggle for power. Yet there is no doubt that U.S. imperial­ ism would welcome and actively support a coup, as it has in the past. A powerful puppet could more effec­ tively extract profits and resources for the benefit of big business abroad. Revolutionary-minded workers and students in the United States can best show their solidarity by organizing against U.S. intervention. We need to make it politically impossible for the U.S. to aid the enemies of the working class. n Circuit in Philadelphia, and sev­ eral other lawsuits arising from the AP expose—one initiated in Brooklyn and one in Manhat­ tan—still await court rulings. These upcom­ ing legal events can provide a focus for edu­ cation about the continuing attacks on the civil liberties of Muslim Americans.

The Council on American Islamic Rela­ tions, for example, is partnering with the ACLU, the Connecticut Coalition to Stop Indefinite Detention, and others to host an educational event called “One Nation—Un­ der Surveillance: A One-Day Conference about Building Networks of Solidarity in Defiance of NSA Spying & the Erosion of Democratic Rights” (see ad on page 2). n • Portland, Ore.: (503) 233-1629 [email protected] • Providence: [email protected] (401) 592-5385 • Salem, Ore.: [email protected] • San Francisco Bay Area:

P.O. Box 10328, Oakland, Ca 94610 (510) 268-9429, sfsocialistaction@ gmail.com • WASHINGTON, DC: [email protected], (202) 286-5493 Socialist Action National Office

----- pull-quotes -----

For info about Socialist Action and how to join: Socialist Action National Office, P.O. Box 10328, Oakland, CA 94610, (510) 268- 9429, [email protected] Socialist Action newspaper editorial offices: [email protected] Website: www.socialistaction.org

← Contents of Vol. 32, No. 3, March 2014

Something wrong on this page? Tell us →