SlutWalks blame system that fosters anti-women violence

Scan page 8

On Oct. 1 nearly 3000 women marched and rallied at Union Square in New York City to protest rape culture, violence against women, and sexual shaming. It was a well-built, well-organized, and militant demonstra­ tion, inspired by the SlutWalks that have occurred in scores of cities around the country and the globe.

The marchers were youthful, multinational, driven by personal experience with the “new sexism,” and fu­ eled by an outrage born of two recent New York City rape cases. In the first, hotel worker Nafissatou Diallo was denied even a trial of the former head of the Inter­ national Monetary Fund, Dominique Strauss-Kahn. In the second, police officers Franklin Matta and Kenneth Moro were acquitted of the repeated rape of a woman they had been called to help, even though forensics and cameras established their guilt.

“NYPD, we know you! You’re racist, sexist, and rap­ ists, too!” chanted the marchers as they wound around the cities streets. Others carried signs and banners that said, “Blame the System, Not the Victim!” This fo­ cus on the police and the system registered the pos­ sibility that an effective movement may be in birth against violence against women—a movement that is sophisticated enough to craft demands and an orga­ nizing culture that is attractive to millions of women, including those in communities wracked by the school to prison pipeline and mass incarceration.

Since its beginnings in Toronto in early 2011, when a police officer insulted a group of campus women by suggesting that if they wanted to safe from rape, “they should quit dressing like sluts,” the SlutWalk brand has been controversial. Initial organizers were eager to divest the word of its power to shame the victims of violent sexual attacks.

In addition to protesting a culture that seems to pro­ mote rape and shame sexually active women, some of the early organizers announced that they would call their action a SlutWalk and attempt to subversively reclaim the word for their own liberation.

The marches became a media sensation, and women eager to protest violence against women and sexual shaming came together in city after city. But protests were raised about this strategy; many organizers agreed but were worried about losing the enthusi­ asm and momentum that had been generated by the SlutWalk phenomenon. So the general rule has been to keep the name and attempt to address in the rallies and marches all the issues and concerns raised about the general approach.

For example, in New York City, while some young women chose to embrace the slut word and don sexu­ alized costumes to mock the virgin/whore dichoto­ my so persistent in U.S. culture, others stood quietly, dressed in sweats or business suits, with signs that read, “This is what I was wearing when I was raped.” The incongruity in tone was jarring but expressive of the real diversity in the movement, as it now exists. Many are wondering if it can grow even further in the direction of the “multi-national, multi-gender, multi-ethnic” ideal that New York City organizers are striv­ ing for.

Just before the New York march, Black Women’s Blue­ print published a sisterly open letter to the NYC Slut­ walk in the Huffington Post and on other sites, saying that Black women could never join a march to reclaim the slut word. On the other hand, they reached out to the New York organizers and expressed their eager­ ness to join together to discuss a “more critical and sustainable plan” for a movement that says no to vio­ lence against women.

NYC SlutWalk organizers responded in kind, an­ nouncing at the rally the first of a series of meetings with the Black Women’s Blueprint and any other activ­ ists who wanted to discuss the kind of movement that is necessary. In an online report-back of that meeting, NYC SlutWalk said that it was “honest, intense, chal­ lenging, occasionally painful, and very needed.” Fur­ ther meetings are planned. n