[Dear editor, Readers of Socialist Action may have…]
1990 1990-10Read it in the scan (PDF at ETOL), page 24 →
Read from the scan by machine and not corrected: expect misread words, and now and then a caption or a line from a neighbouring story. For anything you quote, read the scan.
Scan page 24
Dear editor, Readers of Socialist Action may have seen the Aug. 28 New York Times article which stated that students at U.C.
Berkeley (1) were indifferent to U.S. them. intervention in the Middle East and (2)
The Oct. 20 nationwide demonstrations should be ignored a Socialist Action salesperson displaying the September issue with its "Bring the Troops Home Now!" banner headline. government's intervention in the Middle East. Paratrooper kisses son goodbye. I was on the Berkeley campus the day the Times reporters were there, and talked to them. But I saw something different than they did. I sold 14 issues of SA in just one hour. (An SA sales team at San Francisco State sold 50 paSuch power structures should be the issue of debate-not porn itself."
Formulations such as "pornography is inherently sexist" are not only scientifically unfounded, but offensive and oppressive to the many people of all sexes and sexual orientations who enjoy both mainstream and alternative porn.
In light of the evidence that future right-wing violence may increasingly be focused on issues relating to sexuality, subscribing to antipornography theory-which has already led some to equate prostitutes with scabs and to label even feminist-created porn "womanhating"—could be dangerously disori-