In the mass media only "money talks"

Scan page 15

In conjunction with the 200th anniversary of the U.S. Constitution, Socialist Action is printing a four-part series of articles by Paul Siegel on the topic of democracy in America.

In the first two installments, which appeared in our February and March issues, Professor Siegel reviewed many of the struggles through which democratic rights were won in this country. Following the Civil War, he argued, the increase of wealth of the industrial capitalists made the United States more and more a society that was democratic only in form.

Paul Siegel is Professor Emeritus at Long Island University and the author of several books on political and literary themes. His newest book, "The Meek and the Militant: Religion and Power Across the World," is reviewed on page 15.

A Supreme Court decision once referred to the various forms of communication as providing a "marketplace of ideas." The phrase suggests a village fair at which humble artisans come to sell their products, and shrewd buyers are able to choose from a great array of wares.

Actually, communications have become highly monopolized, with small publications eking out a marginal existence. Only 4 percent of the cities in the United States have newspapers under more than one ownership.

Most large-circulation newspapers are owned by chains such as Gannett, KnightRidder, and Newhouse. If newspapers are not members of a chain, they carry syndicated columns and news services.

For most readers, the choice in the "marketplace of ideas" offered by the press is like the choice between McDonalds's and Burger King. A very few newspapers, such CAN DELIVER THE LINES AS GOOD AS EVER, BUT THEY KEEP CHANGING THE SCRIPTS ON ME" as The New York Times, provide more substantial fare-but they are written for an elite. One must know how to sift through them for significant facts and how to take into account their class bias and self-imposed restrictions.

The TV monopoly Television, from which 80 percent of all Americans are said to get most of their news, is even more monopolized. Controlling shares of NBC, CBS, and ABC are owned by Chase Manhattan Bank, Morgan Guaranty Trust, Bank of New York, Bankers Trust, and Citibank-that is, by the Rockefeller and Morgan empires.

Eighty percent of the "independent" stations are network affiliates and get most of their programs, except for the nightly local news, from the networks. The networks compete for "ratings," which determine the amount of money they can 14 SOCIALIST ACTION abd get from sponsors. But, like competing politicians, there is really little difference between the networks.

Television presents events as disconnected happenings. It then calls upon "experts" to comment on the chaotic flow of images. Viewers are made to feel powerless in their bewilderment and dependent upon the "expert," who will tell them what to think and how to respond.

Although the viewer is often cynical about television—which one moment tells how his or her life will be altered by political vents and another moment how it will be altered by buying the right deodorant-the authoritative voice of the "expert" has its unrecognized effect.

A biased vocabulary The underlying assumptions in news accounts and commentary are indicated by such phrases as "our investments abroad" and " our markets." But most Americans do not either own anything or sell anything abroad.

A few huge corporations are identified with the whole country. It is taken for granted that what is good for them is good for the country, something that is by no means obvious, especially when "our boys" are sent to fight for "our interests."

The bias of the media is revealed in the use of the word "terrorist" for the Irish Republican Army and the Palestine Liberation Organization but not for the contras in Nicaragua. However, the misguided terrorist acts of the IRA and the PLO liberation fighters are far exceeded by the violence of the contras-who have systematically killed thousands of peasants, coffee-harvesters, and educational and health workers.

This bias is revealed, too, in the habitual use of the word "surrogate" to define the relation of Cuba to the Soviet Union but not to define the relation of Honduras to the United States-which uses Honduras as a base for the contras.

It is revealed, finally, in the habitual use of the word "satellites" for the Eastern European states but not for the Central American states. Romania, however, has a higher degree of independence than El Salvador has.

Despite the common assumptions that prevail, television stations make a great point of "fairness" and "balance." What this means is that the commentators on their programs run the gamut of opinion from A to B. The moderator of a panel of commentators implicitly suggests that the truth lies somewhere between A and B. The other letters of the alphabet are disregarded.

Radical critics of the status quo, including those with numerous books and APRIL 1987 BY MARLETTE FOR THE CHARLOTTE OBS articles and impressive academic credentials, do not qualify as experts for television.

CBS and Gen. Westmoreland Ultra-conservatives often inveigh against the "liberal media." They want to have as commentators only those of category A, not of category B. The difference between the ultra-conservatives and the media was indicated in the law suit by General Westmoreland-backed by these ultraconservatives-against CBS.

The network had shown a documentary claiming that Westmoreland deliberately deceived Johnson about the strength of the Vietnamese during the war. Westmoreland's lawyers were able to show how CBS, by editing interviews, was able to slant them. They exposed the network's techniques not just on this occasion but in its general practice.

On the other hand, CBS was able to present such damaging evidence against Westmoreland that the doughty general had to beat a retreat and settle out of court for a CBS statement that praised him for his patriotism but did not retract the charge that he was a liar.

The issue, however, of how much Westmoreland deceived Johnson in the narrow interests of the military establishment is not of the first importance to the American people. What is really important to them is how they were deceived by Johnson aided by the military.

Johnson had been able to get Congress to pass virtually unanimously the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. The government used the resolution to unconstitutionally carry on an undeclared war—on the pretext that North Vietnam had sought to torpedo an American warship.

There was no evidence, as sober historians now acknowledge, that North Vietnam had really taken this action so obviously opposed to its own interest. But neither Congress, the "free press," nor the "liberal" TV commentators questioned the allegation then—or since that time.

Money talks in elections Through the monopolized media and the election campaigns. Sometimes it whispers insinuatingly so that people are influenced subliminally without realizing it. Other times it bellows. Radical parties are like soap-box orators in a public park where a competing powerful public address system drowns them out.

In addition to the free publicity the Republicans and Democratic parties get in the media, they buy 30-second TV "spots" that sell candidates the way commercials tell you that Fab is better than Tide or vice versa.

The same techniques-the hypnotic repetition of slogans and catchwords devoid of content, the killing of critical faculties through irrational appeals, the attractive packaging of the product-are used in selling politicians who have little different to offer from each other.

This was not what Thomas Jefferson meant when he spoke of an informed citizenry being the basis of a healthy democracy.

Election campaigns are not political processes in which the masses of people actively participate. They are like wrestling matches which leave a lot of people indifferent but which a lot of others find exciting to watch-even though they suspect that the grunts and grimaces are more acting than reality.

The culmination of the campaigns is the TV presidential "debates." Here the object is not to inform and reason. It is to project an image of knowledge, self-assurance, coolness under stress, amiability, patriotism, and so forth.

Americans are deceived

A Reagan official, speaking not for attribution, told a reporter (New York Times, Nov. 1, 1984), "You can say anything you want during a debate and 80 million people hear it." If the next day, reporters document what are charitably described as misstatements, he added, "So "SO MUCH FOR THE INTERNAȚIONAL NEWSTHE FACTS WILL BE ALONG LATER"

• WASHINGION • NICABAGUA • HONDURAS DLUIBYA Fami what? Maybe people read it, or 2000, or 20,000."

Although Americans may be deceived by this lying and manipulation, they are also to one degree or another aware of it. This contributes to cynicism and a sense of powerlessness.

Many feel that it doesn't make much difference if they cast a vote. The poor especially have this feeling. In recent years, 60 percent to 65 percent of those eligible do not vote in congressional and state elections, and 40 percent to 45 percent do not vote in presidential elections.

Nevertheless, although the freedom guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the right to engage in electoral campaigns are vitiated by the economic and political power of the monopoly capitalists, they remain conquests that must be defended.

The roar of the mass media is mighty and the sense of powerlessness is paralyzing. But especially in times of social crisis, life itself impels people in the direction to which socialists are pointing-the construction of a new and more genuine democratic order.

What will democracy look like in the socialist America of the future? I'll take up this question in next month's Socialist Action.

----- pull-quotes -----

• AMERIKA, AMERIKA, JA 5 NIELSEN SHED HIS GRACE ON THEE MAKE THE RATINGS GOOD, EXPLOIT A PARANOID MOOD, FROM SEA TO SHINING SEA...

Television presents event as disconnecte happenings."